扫描学姐二维码

领取考研资料

领取考研资料
领取考研资料

雷哥考研 > 题库 > 2020年管理类联考英语(二)真题卷 > 阅读理解A

Text 3 Madrid was hailed as a public health beacon last November when it rolled out ambitious restrictions on the most polluting cars. Seven months and one election day later, a new conservative city council suspended enforcement of the clean air zone, a first step toward its possible demise. Mayor José Luis Martínez-Almeida made opposition to the zone a centrepiece of his election campaign, despite its success in improving air quality. A judge has now overruled the city’s decision to stop levying fines, ordering them reinstated. But with legal battles ahead, the zone’s future looks uncertain at best. Among other weaknesses, the measures cities must employ when left to tackle dirty air on their own are politically contentious, and therefore vulnerable. That’s because they inevitably put the costs of cleaning the air on to individual drivers—who must pay fees or buy better vehicles—rather than on to the car manufacturers whose cheating is the real cause of our toxic pollution. It’s not hard to imagine a similar reversal happening in London. The new ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) is likely to be a big issue in next year’s mayoral election. And if Sadiq Khan wins and extends it to the North and South Circular roads in 2021 as he intends, it is sure to spark intense opposition from the far larger number of motorists who will then be affected. It’s not that measures such as London’s Ulez are useless. Far from it. Local officials are using the levers that are available to them to safeguard residents’ health in the face of a serious threat. The zones do deliver some improvements to air quality, and the science tells us that means real health benefits—fewer heart attacks, strokes and premature births, less cancer, dementia and asthma. Fewer untimely deaths. But mayors and councilors can only do so much about a problem that is far bigger than any one city or town. They are acting because national governments —Britain’s and others across Europe – have failed to do so. Restrictions that keep highly polluting cars out of certain areas—city centers, “school streets”, even individual roads – are a response to the absence of a larger effort to properly enforce existing regulations and require auto companies to bring their vehicles into compliance. Wales has introduced special low speed limits to minimize pollution. We’re doing everything but insist that manufacturers clean up their cars.

35. It can be inferred from the last paragraph that auto companies _____.

正确答案:B

  • 雷哥网解析
  • 网友解析
【选项】[A]将会增加低排放量的汽车制造 [B]应该强制执行规则 [C]将会升级他们的汽车设计 [D]应该放在公共监督之下 【解析】推理判断题。根据题目可知,需要定位到最后一段,“Restrictions that keep highly polluting cars out of certain areas—city centers, “school streets”, even individual roads – are a response to the absence of a larger effort to properly enforce existing regulations and require auto companies to bring their vehicles into compliance.”该句话的意思是说“限制高污染汽车进入某些区域、市中心、学校街道、甚至个别道路,是对缺乏更大力度来适当执行现有法规和要求汽车公司遵守其车辆规定的回应。”可知选项B.“应该强迫其遵守规则”正确。

题目讨论 0条评论)

用户头像
提交

    近期活动

    领取资料
    关闭
    扫码领取考研体验课+院校资料
    扫码领取考研体验课+院校资料