扫描学姐二维码

领取考研资料

领取考研资料
领取考研资料

雷哥考研 > 题库 > 2020年管理类联考英语(二)真题卷 > 阅读理解A

Text 3 Madrid was hailed as a public health beacon last November when it rolled out ambitious restrictions on the most polluting cars. Seven months and one election day later, a new conservative city council suspended enforcement of the clean air zone, a first step toward its possible demise. Mayor José Luis Martínez-Almeida made opposition to the zone a centrepiece of his election campaign, despite its success in improving air quality. A judge has now overruled the city’s decision to stop levying fines, ordering them reinstated. But with legal battles ahead, the zone’s future looks uncertain at best. Among other weaknesses, the measures cities must employ when left to tackle dirty air on their own are politically contentious, and therefore vulnerable. That’s because they inevitably put the costs of cleaning the air on to individual drivers—who must pay fees or buy better vehicles—rather than on to the car manufacturers whose cheating is the real cause of our toxic pollution. It’s not hard to imagine a similar reversal happening in London. The new ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) is likely to be a big issue in next year’s mayoral election. And if Sadiq Khan wins and extends it to the North and South Circular roads in 2021 as he intends, it is sure to spark intense opposition from the far larger number of motorists who will then be affected. It’s not that measures such as London’s Ulez are useless. Far from it. Local officials are using the levers that are available to them to safeguard residents’ health in the face of a serious threat. The zones do deliver some improvements to air quality, and the science tells us that means real health benefits—fewer heart attacks, strokes and premature births, less cancer, dementia and asthma. Fewer untimely deaths. But mayors and councilors can only do so much about a problem that is far bigger than any one city or town. They are acting because national governments —Britain’s and others across Europe – have failed to do so. Restrictions that keep highly polluting cars out of certain areas—city centers, “school streets”, even individual roads – are a response to the absence of a larger effort to properly enforce existing regulations and require auto companies to bring their vehicles into compliance. Wales has introduced special low speed limits to minimize pollution. We’re doing everything but insist that manufacturers clean up their cars.

32. Which is considered a weakness of the city-level measures to tackle dirty air?

正确答案:D

  • 雷哥网解析
  • 网友解析
【选项】[A]他们对汽车制造商有偏见 [B]它们对市议会来说是不切实际的 [C]他们被认为对政治家来说太温和了 [D]他们给每个开车的人增加了太多的负担 【解析】细节题。根据文章第四段“ That’s because they inevitably put the costs of cleaning the air on to individual drivers—who must pay fees or buy better vehicles—rather than on to the car manufacturers whose cheating is the real cause of our toxic pollution.”可知“这是因为,他们不可避免地把清洁空气的成本转嫁到个别司机身上,这些司机必须支付费用或购买更好的车辆,而不是转嫁到汽车制造商身上,而汽车制造商的欺骗行为才是造成我们有毒污染的真正原因。”可知与D 选项“他们给每个开车的人增加了太多的负担”相符,故选项D正确。

题目讨论 0条评论)

用户头像
提交

    近期活动

    领取资料
    关闭
    扫码领取考研体验课+院校资料
    扫码领取考研体验课+院校资料